Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 KAN 578 - Hohmann v. Jones

Hohmann v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1996

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

201937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Badger · Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co. · 86 Ind. App. 534 - Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Waltz · Woods v. Kansas City, Kaw Valley & Western Railroad · Durkin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It seems clear that defendant owed to the deceased the duty of due care with respect to the truck, with its equipment and driver, which he furnished. The applicable rule is well stated by the American Law Institute, sectipn 408, Restatement of Torts, as follows: “One who leases a chattel as safe for immediate use is subject to liability to those whom he should expect to use the chattel, or to be in the vicinity of its probable use, for bodily harm caused by its use, in a manner for which, and by a person for whose use, it is leased, if the lessor fails to exercise reasonable care to make it safe for such use or to disclose its actual condition to those who may be expected to use it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.