Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 KAN 781 - Johnson v. Beach

Johnson v. Beach’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1965
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1965

6 state decisions

201937194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batchelor v. Walburn · Neifert v. Ames · Dale Nessley & Co. v. Taylor · Tarpy v. Persing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"At common law (54 C.J. 418) and under our statutes, G.S. 1935, 60-1002 and 61-502, replevin is a possessory action. To maintain replevin under our statutes the plaintiff must show ( a ) that he owns the property, or that he has a special ownership or interest therein; ( b ) that he is entitled to the immediate possession of the property, and ( c ) that the property is wrongfully detained by the defendant. ( Batchelor v. Walburn, 23 Kan. 733 .)" (p. 782.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Herl v. State Bank of Parsons
  2. ““A lien is not ownership, general or special. It is a claim or charge for the payment of an obligation, and the statute provides the method of enforcement. Under attachment the property may be sold, and the rights of both parties are protected. But in replevin, if plaintiff is the absolute owner, he keeps the property and is not required to account to anyone.” (p. 783.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Eresch v. Quakenbush

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.