Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Md. App. 203 - Thacker v. Hale

146 Md. App. 203 - Thacker v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2021

21 state decisions

120200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Walter v. Gunter · First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of Securities · Grant v. Zich · Liberty Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Irregularities warranting the exercise of revisory powers most often involve a judgment that resulted from a failure of process or procedure by the clerk of a court, including, for example, failures to send notice of a default judgment, to send notice of an order dismissing an action, to mail a notice to the proper address, and to provided for required publication.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Maryland courts have narrowly defined and strictly applied the terms fraud, mistake, [and] irregularity, in order to ensure finality of judgments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “embraces all the power the courts of this State have to revise and control enrolled judgments and decrees”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.