Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 MICH 188 - Bartlett v. Smith

Bartlett v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
October 1937
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1937

10 state decisions

401906191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dwight v. Cutler · Davis v. Strobridge · Atkinson v. Scott · Getty v. Peters · Ferris v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If plaintiffs were entitled to recover, the rule is that they were entitled to recover the payments made, and the reasonable value of the improvements made in good faith, less the value of the use of the premises.” Bartlett v. Smith, 146 Mich. 188 ( 117 Am. St. Rep. 625 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The promise to extend the time of payment, if made, was a mere naked promise, resting in parol, without any consideration, and was therefore of no validity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.