Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 MISC 231 - Little v. Little

Little v. Little’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
April 1967
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1967

10 state decisions

401932194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lynde v. . Lynde · Moore v. . Moore · In Re the Accounting of Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The proper remedy of the defendant would seem to be to obtain a modification in the courts of the state in which the judgment of divorce was originally rendered. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.