State v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1980
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Raucho · State v. Allison · State v. Campbell · State v. Lagge · State v. Byrne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is not for us, an appellate court, to determine the credibility of a witness or to evaluate the testimony, rather, that is a function for a jury and their decision will not be disturbed by us without a clear showing in the record that either perjury, impeachment or extenuating circumstances were clearly present.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gloyne · State v. Dunn““In State v. London, 131 Mont. 410 , 310 P.2d 571 , this court held that any exhibit having a direct connection with the commission of a crime is admissible. “In State v. Allison, 122 Mont. 120, 133 , 199 P.2d 279, 287 , we said: ‘The applicable rule of law is stated by this court as follows in State v. Harris, 66 Mont. 34 , 213 P. 215 , 217:“* * * the general rule being that weapons found at or near the place of arrest are properly admitted in evidence as a part of the history of the arrest, and as bearing on the crime, although not clearly shown to have been the property of the accused or used in the commission of the crime.” ’ “Weapons, tools, bullets, instruments, or other articles which appear from other evidence to have been employed in the commission of the crime are admissible in evidence.” State v. Byrne, 60 Mont. 317, 325 , 199 P. 262, 264 .’ Also 22A C.J.S. Criminal Law § 712. IV Nichols, Appleid Evidence, p. 3276, § 341, and V Nichols, Applied Evidence, p. 4716, § 9.” State v. Doe, supra, 146 Mont. at 504-505 , 409 P.2d at 411 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Fitzpatrick““Defendant cannot now put the trial court in error by his attempt to raise this question for the first time in this court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Perkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.