Frazier v. . Cherokee Indians’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1930
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians v. United States · State v. . Ta-Cha-Na-Tah · Rollins v. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians · Den on Demise of Strother v. Cathey · McAden v. Palmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The North Carolina Cherokees were entitled to certain moneys after the war, and the United States refused to pay it over to them unless they moved to the Indian Territory, or secured an act of the Legislature of North Carolina allowing them to remain per manently in this state. Such act was promptly passed by the Legislature. Laws 1866, p. 120, c. 54.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.