Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 N.C. App. 288 - Clark v. Penland

146 N.C. App. 288 - Clark v. Penland’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2021

17 state decisions

100200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Briley v. Farabow · 99 N.C. App. 30 - Roane-Barker v. Southeastern Hospital Supply Corp. · 121 N.C. App. 175 - Hursey v. Homes by Design, Inc. · Harris v. Harris · 145 N.C. App. 621 - Henderson v. Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Sanctions by Court in Which Action is Pending -If a party ... fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, ... a judge of the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following: a. An order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order; b. An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting the party from introducing designated matters into evidence; c. An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party; d. In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order treating as a contempt of court the failure to obey any orders except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination[.] ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is well established that orders regarding discovery matters are within the discretion of the trial court and will not be upset on appeal absent a showing of abuse of that discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.