Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 N.C. App. 442 - King v. King

146 N.C. App. 442 - King v. King’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boyce v. McMahan · Lane v. Coe · Chappell v. Roth · Thompson v. . Umberger · Croom v. . Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is generally the appellant's duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete and this Court will not presume error by the trial court when none appears on the record to this Court .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must either be certain in itself or capable of being reduced to a certainty by a recurrence to something extrinsic to which it refers,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]here must be language in the deed sufficient to serve as a pointer or a guide to the ascertainment of the location of the land.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.