Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 NEB 1 - Ewing v. Gilbert

Ewing v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Stormon v. Weiss (1954), McDowell v. Parker (1948)

42 state decisions

14019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fritzler v. Keithley · Witte v. Witte · Halsted v. Schuetz · Bowman v. Bowman · Bose v. Knutzen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court in the case of In re Goist's Estate , 146 Neb. 1 , 18 N.W.2d 513 , 521, 522, quoting from a previous case stated as follows: No right of the citizen is more valued than the power to dispose of his property by will. No right is more solemnly assured to him by the law. Nor does it depend in any sense upon the judicious exercise of that right. It rarely happens that a man bequeaths his estate to the entire satisfaction of either his family or friends. The law wisely secures equality of distribution where a man dies intestate, but the very object of a will is to produce inequality.... In this country a man's prejudices form a part of his liberty. He has a right to them. He may be unjust to his children or relatives. He is entitled to the control of his property while living, and by will to direct its use after his death, subject only to such restrictions as are imposed by law. Where a man has sufficient memory and understanding to make a will, and such instrument is not the result of undue influence, it is not to be set aside without sufficient evidence, nor upon sentimental notions of equality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.