Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 N.M. 301 - State v. Barr

State v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012), State v. Bullcoming (2010)

49 state decisions

340200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Fahy v. Connecticut · Lutwak v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) substantial evidence to support the conviction without reference to the improperly admitted evidence; (2) such a disproportionate volume of permissible evidence that, in comparison, the amount of improper evidence will appear minuscule; and (3) no substantial conflicting evidence to discredit the State's testimony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “with the unprecedented expansion of federal constitutional protections into the criminal process, harmless error analysis was imported into the constitutional context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “require appellate courts to affirm lower courts notwithstanding technical errors, defects, or exceptions which did not affect the substantial rights of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.