Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 N.M. 409 - State v. Mendez

State v. Mendez’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Arizona v. Washington · White v. Illinois · Crist v. Bretz · State v. Woodward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e do not read Romero as allowing the state to appeal only when the district court's ruling makes it impossible for the state to prove its case. Rather, we interpret Romero as requiring that the excluded evidence be important or significant, as opposed to evidence of minor consequence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e observe that the special concurrences of Judges Bustamante and Fry in Gomez constitute the opinion of this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.