Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 N.M. 462 - State v. Trossman

State v. Trossman’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Rounds (2011), State v. Gonzales (2011)

29 state decisions

190200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · State v. Apodaca · State v. Parish · State v. Roybal · State v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although a [fact-finder] is certainly entitled to draw reasonable conclusions from the circumstantial evidence produced at trial, it must not be left to speculate in the absence of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “undermine the factfinder's responsibility at trial, based on evidence adduced by the State, to find the ultimate facts beyond a reasonable doubt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the [s]tate to prove the child's presence in a situation where harm was both probable and sufficiently grave to justify a criminal sanction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.