State v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Rivera (2010), State v. Anaya (2009)
57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A reviewing court should not substitute its judgment for that of the issuing court. Rather ... the reviewing court must determine whether the affidavit as a whole, and the reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom, provide a substantial basis for determining that there is probable cause to believe that a search will uncover evidence of wrongdoing.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vest · State v. Gurule“[T]he substantial basis standard of review is more deferential than the de novo review applied to questions of law, but less deferential than the substantial evidence standard applied to questions of fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vest · State v. Trujillo“and the issuing court `has found probable cause, the [reviewing] courts should not invalidate the warrant by interpreting the affidavit in a hypertechnical, rather than commonsense, manner.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vest · State v. Trujillo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.