Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

146 N.Y.S. 525

Feinstein v. Jacobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-03-06

<p>Injunction (§ 58*)—Contracts—Use of Property.</p> <p>An agreement not to rent property to competitors of the adjoining owner may be enforced by injunction, though it provides that the promisor shall “be liable in damages and breach of contract” in case of its violation.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Injunction, Cent. Dig. §§ 111-113; Dec. Dig. § 58.*]</p>

Relies on Diamond Match Co. v. . Roeber · Lewis v. . Gollner

Reversed · Decided 1914-03-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1The fact,that the agreement provided, in case of its violation by defendant, he should “be liable in damages and breach of contract” does not, in view of the circumstances, deprive plaintiff of the right to equitable relief. Lewis v. Gollner, 129 N. Y. 227, 234, 29 N. E. 81, 26 Am. St. Rep. 516; Diamond Match Co. v. Roeber, 106 N. Y. 473, 486, 13 N. E. 419, 60 Am. Rep. 464. Defendant’s counsel concedes that the demurrer is bad, inasmuch as it did not specify the parties failure to join whom constituted the defect. This defect in pleading could not be cured on the motion, under Code Civ. Proc. § 768.

¶2The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs, and the demurrer overruled, with $10 costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer, and to answer upon payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

/146/nys/525 · .json · Public domain