Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Ohio App. 3d 233 - State v. Scott

146 Ohio App. 3d 233 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2025

7 state decisions

30200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gault · State v. Bradley · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court should apply a totality of the circumstances test, including where the interrogation occurred, whether the investigation had focused on the subject, whether the objective indicia of arrest were present, and the length of *Page 14 the questioning involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.