Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Ohio App. 3d 81 - State v. Echols

146 Ohio App. 3d 81 - State v. Echols’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2021

14 state decisions

60200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Thompkins · Barker v. Wingo · State v. Jenks · Neil v. Biggers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “nevertheless serves to provide useful guidelines to evaluate what constitutes a `reasonable time' for constitutional speedy-trial purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, delays over one year are presumptively prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.