Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Or. 1 - Walter v. Turtle

Walter v. Turtle’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1974
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on King v. Union Oil Company · Carlson v. Mock · Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. Hyde · Iltz v. Krieger · Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Generally speaking, the plant of the employer may be said to be the machinery, tools and equipment as well as the place where such machinery, tools, and equipment are operated in carrying on the business in which he is engaged. * * "`Plant means the fixtures, tools, apparatus, appliances, etc., necessary to carry on any trade, mechanical operation or process.' [Citations omitted.]"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`Plant means the fixtures, tools, apparatus, appliances, etc., necessary to carry on any trade, mechanical operation or process.' [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.