146 So. 3d 113 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 731 So. 2d 638 - Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA · State v. Jano · 992 So. 2d 96 - Hudson v. State · 95 So. 3d 134 - Delhall v. State · 923 So. 2d 1288 - Frederick v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether the declarant made an excited utterance is a 2 We do not further address whether this particular statement was not hearsay within the stated definition and its exceptions in section 90.801 because this issue was not raised and because, assuming that it was hearsay, it was still admissible under the excited utterance exception of section 90.803. -8- preliminary question of fact for the trial court, and the court's ruling is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Roop v. State · Raymond v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.