Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 SO3D 1270 - F.T. v. State

F.T. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. State · Watson v. State · Tejada v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “which is simply the price affixed to the retail item at the time it was stolen.... [W]e do not agree that a business records foundation must be laid before a witness is permitted to testify to her contemporaneous observation of the contents of the price tag affixed to the stolen item of retail merchandise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If a person steals a shirt from a store and the price stated on the tag affixed to the shirt is $100, the content of that price tag is not hearsay because it is not coming in to prove the truth of the matter asserted but only to establish what the tag”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'Hearsay' is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.