Couch v. Couch’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schwartz v. Schwartz · Holt v. Chenault
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he parties are entitled to know what evidence is used or relied upon by the trial court, and have the right generally to present rebutting evidence or to cross-examine, unless such right is waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. May v. Harrison“a record of such interview must be made so that the parties are afforded the subsequent opportunity to determine and contradict the accuracy of statements and facts given during the interview.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. May v. Harrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.