Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 TEX 18 - Fry v. Tucker

Fry v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Buckholts Independent School District v. Glaser (1982), In Re Union Pacific Resources Co. (1998)

46 state decisions

10019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Dallas v. Peacock · Postal Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Ellis · Schultze v. McLeary · Slaven v. Wheeler · Seabrook v. First Nat. Bank of Port Lavaca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"That no man ought to be judge in any case where he has a personal or pecuniary interest is an ancient rule, the strictest observance of which is demanded by public policy and natural justice. This principle is embodied in the constitution [Article V § 11], which declares that no judge shall sit in any case wherein he may be interested. A similar provision is contained in the Revised Statutes [Article 15], superseding all prior statutes with respect to the disqualification of judges. * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No judge or justice of the peace shall sit in any case wherein he may be interested or where either of the parties may be connected with him by affinity or consanguinity within the third degree, or where he shall have been counsel in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.