Gilkey v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Huffman v. Huffman (1960), Bergin v. Bergin (1958)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heller v. Heller · Adams v. Maris · In re the Estate of Kavanagh · Johnson v. Goldstein · West v. West
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * where a will bears earmarks of having been drawn by a layman, and not by a lawyer, the •court, in the endeavor to arrive at the intent of the testator, will not view the language technically but liberally and with reference to its popular meaning.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stewart v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.