Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 TEXCRIM 115 - May v. State

May v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2017

6 state decisions

2019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 53 Tex. Crim. 2 - Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . . The allegation of an offense is complete when a failure to stop is set forth; and the failure to render aid is but another and further allegation of a method of violating such law. The failure to render aid is not a necessary allegation, and if descriptive at all of the offense, is merely a further and additional method of the violation of the statute. We can eliminate the portion of the charge relative to rendering aid, and we still find the proof not only uncontradicted but admitted by the appellant that he failed to stop after having struck this boy."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when the jury found that appellant did not stop, his guilt of the offense charged in the indictment was established,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.