¶1In his motion for rehearing, appellant for the first time attacks the sufficiency of the indictment to support the conviction.
¶2The indictment follows substantially that which has been approved by this Court. Simmons v. State, 169 S.W.2d 171; Houston v. State, 158 S.W.2d 1004, 143 Tex.Crim. R.. *513
¶3The motion for rehearing is overruled.
¶4The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.