Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 U.S. 140 - Mattox v. United States

Mattox v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

146 U.S. 140 · 1892

Citation profile

2,263
cited by 2,263 later decisions
67
cited 67 times by the Supreme Court
45
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

987 federal appellate · 87 district · 641 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,263 later decisions (67 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2025 · most notably Pointer v. Texas (1965), Dutton v. Evans (1970)

987 federal appellate · 87 district · 641 state decisions — followed in 45 states

401018921900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The United States v. Thomas Reid and Edward Clements · Newcomb v. Wood · Woodward v. Leavitt · Henderson v. Moore

Cited together with Remmer v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Parker v. Gladden · Turner v. Louisiana · Smith v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,263 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the power to disturb the express conclusions of twelve.”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]rivate communications, possibly prejudicial, between jurors and third persons, or witnesses, or the officer in charge, are absolutely forbidden, and invalidate the verdict, at least unless their harmlessness is made to appear.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “free from external causes tending to disturb the exercise of deliberate and unbiassed [sic] judgment.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.