Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 U.S. 370 - Lewis v. United States

Lewis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

146 U.S. 370 · 1892

Citation profile

1,512
cited by 1,512 later decisions
66
cited 66 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

600 federal appellate · 34 district · 651 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,512 later decisions (66 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2025 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Swain v. State of Alabama (1965)

600 federal appellate · 34 district · 651 state decisions — followed in 46 states

371018921900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · Ball v. United States · United States v. Rindskopf · Schwab v. Berggren

Cited together with Illinois v. Allen · Swain v. State of Alabama · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · Pointer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,512 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A leading principle that pervades the entire law of criminal procedure is that, after indictment found, nothing shall be done in the absence of the prisoner.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sudden impressions and unaccountable prejudices we are apt to conceive upon the bare looks and gestures of another,”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “For it is, as Blackstone says, an arbitrary and capricious right; and it must be exercised with full freedom, or it fails of its full purpose.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.