State v. Bubar’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 district · 104 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Catsam (1987), State v. Recor (1988)
2 district · 104 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Young · State v. Saldana · State v. Bailey · State v. Mecier · State v. Moran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he prosecutor's argument that it was difficult for the complainant to testify as she did was a permissible argument as to credibility. It did not ... violate the rule that the jury cannot be asked to put themselves in the victim's place....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he defendant is entitled to know what conduct is forbidden before the initiation of a probation revocation proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'given any thought to how difficult it was for [the victim] to sit up here and do what she did' by testifying.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.