Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Vt. 475 - State v. Percy

State v. Percy’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
7
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably Gall v. Parker (2000), State v. Catsam (1987)

4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

18019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Hasting · Smith v. State · United States v. Jackson · United States v. Winston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Profile or syndrome evidence is evidence elicited from an expert that a person is a member of a class of persons who share a common physical, emotional, or mental condition. [T]he condition must be one that is generally recognized in the field.” Profile evidence is typically admitted in evidence to assist the jury in understanding “superficially bizarre behavior” of a putative victim, such as a child’s ambivalence about pursuing a sexual abuse complaint, or a child’s recantation of an earlier accusation. In these situations, the expert’s testimony may be useful to dispel misconceptions about the behavior of victims of certain crimes and to show that the conduct of the complaining witness, however seemingly unusual, is consistent with the profile. The function of the testimony is thus primarily rehabilitative, where behaviors such as delay in reporting, recantation, or a continued relationship with the alleged abuser may be mistaken as impeaching the credibility of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The final inquiry is whether the defendant's rights were so injuriously affected as to deprive him of a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.