Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. Childs

146 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. Childs’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2007

15 state decisions

80198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Jackson v. Denno · Mincey v. Arizona · Estelle v. Smith · Miller v. Fenton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fellatio is the oral stimulation of the penis,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “includes oral stimulation of the penis without penetration into the mouth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[flellatio, the oral stimulation of the penis, is sexual intercourse”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.