146 Wis. 2d 366 - State v. Kazee’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2024
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · LundBerg v. Bannan · United States v. Seale · United States v. Calabro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an accused must not be permitted to manipulate the right of counsel to delay the orderly procedures for trials or interfere with the administration of justice .... As a result of the significant adverse effect that last-minute requests can have on the judicial system, we have directed [circuit] courts to balance the defendant's right to adequate representation against the public interest in the prompt and efficient administration of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A discretionary decision which does not demonstrate consideration of the facts on which the court's reasoning should be based is an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Batista“tantamount to a request for new counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.