Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 Wis. 2d 442 - State v. Nelson

146 Wis. 2d 442 - State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2015

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

1401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Missouri v. Hunter · Whalen v. United States · Bloom v. Illinois · Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plain purpose of a bail jumping law is to deter those who have been released pending disposition of criminal charges from violating the conditions of their bond.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Bail jumping — violation of the conditions of a bond — is a 'violation of the law, a public wrong which is punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.' Because the offense 'diminishes the power of a court to control those properly within its jurisdiction and afflicts the court with detrimental effects,' it is itself made a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[B]ail jumping laws are intended not only to deter bail jumping, but also to enhance the effective administration of justice in the courts. . . . [C]ourts impose bond conditions with the intent to protect members of the community . . . and prevent a defendant from violating the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.