J. Markham v. Thomas W. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Mistick, Inc. v. Northwestern National Casualty Co. · Commonwealth v. Mockaitis · Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Co. · Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Israel · Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'we must view the evidence of record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and enter judgment only if there is no genuine issue as to any material facts and the right to judgment is clear as a matter of law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An actual controversy exists when litigation is both imminent and inevitable and the declaration sought will practically help to end the controversy between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Granting or denying a petition for a declaratory judgment is committed to the sound discretion of a court of original jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.