¶1Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s sole claim on appeal is *897that the showup conducted by the police was impermissibly suggestive and denied him due process of law. We disagree. A showup which occurs shortly after a crime and near the crime scene is an acceptable means of securing identification of a suspect (People v Brnja, 50 NY2d 366). A showup is also tolerable in the interest of prompt identification while witnesses’ memories are fresh (see, People v Riley, 70 NY2d 523; People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1024). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maas, J. — grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
147 A.D.2d 896
People v. Everett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1989
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1989-02-03
Decided 1989-02-03