Rollins v. Vidmar’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2011
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · Manufacturers' Lease Plans, Inc. v. Alverson Draughon College · Meyers v. Hamilton Corp. · 20 Wash. App. 472 - Barer v. Goldberg · Mitchell v. American Reserve Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Did defendant cause an event to occur in Arizona out of which the claim arose? 2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did defendant have sufficient minimum contacts with Arizona to justify the assumption by an Arizona court of personal jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the property of the [marital] community [] liable for the contracts of either spouse which are made after marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sigmund v. Rea
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.