State v. Love’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2011
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jameson · State v. Fettis · 462 So. 2d 1013 - Orr v. State · State v. Waggoner · People v. Codding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The constitutionally protected right to be present ... may be waived if the defendant voluntarily absents himself. ... It is the responsibility of an out-of-custody defendant to remain in contact ... with the court____The appellant failed to do so in this case, and she cannot benefit from her misconduct by manipulating a rule designed for her protection.”) (citation omitted); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Walker“We agree with the appellant that, without more, there was insufficient foundation to admit the security employee’s testimony as to the value of the property. Rule 701, Arizona Rules of Evidence. The testimony of a person who is not familiar with the pricing of merchandise, unless corroborated, is insufficient to establish value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Salazar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.