In Re Schoonover’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. · Stinson v. Williamson · Armstrong v. Lindberg · Lindberg Armstrong v. A Lindberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, a statutory scheme is coherent and consistent, there is generally no need for the court to inquire beyond the plain language of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcus v. Zeman“exempt under ... State or local law that is applicable on the date of the filing of the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcus v. Zeman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.