People v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
February 1968
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Shorts · 99 Cal. App. 2d 476 - People v. James · 98 Cal. App. 2d 687 - People v. Kirk · 90 Cal. App. 2d 205 - People v. Krout · 135 Cal. App. 2d 65 - People v. Bible
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The applicant for the writ 'must show that the facts upon which he relies were not known to him and could not in the exercise of due diligence have been discovered by him at any time substantially earlier than the time of his motion for the writ; otherwise he has stated no ground for relief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Tannehill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.