147 Cal. App. 4th 740 - Hahn v. Mirda’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 Cal. 3d 311 - Blank v. Kirwan · 8 Cal. 3d 229 - Cobbs v. Grant · 6 Cal. 3d 195 - Budd v. Nixen · 12 Cal. 3d 382 - Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. · 31 Cal. 3d 220 - Turpin v. Sortini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he elements of an action for fraud and deceit based on concealment are: (1) the defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact, (2) the defendant must have been under a duty to disclose the fact to the plaintiff, (3) the defendant must have intentionally concealed or suppressed the fact with the intent to defraud the plaintiff, (4) the plaintiff must have been unaware of the fact and would not have acted as he did if he had known of the concealed or suppressed fact, and (5) as a result of the concealment or suppression of the fact, the plaintiff must have sustained damage.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“is not intended to prevent honest complainants from correcting erroneous allegations or prevent the correction of ambiguous facts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.