Toland v. Strohl’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2017
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Rochin v. People of California · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Palko v. State of Connecticut · City of Canon City v. Merris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Essentially it is a review proceeding of an inferior tribunal and thus testimony is not in order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. J.S. v. Chambers“placed in status quo by refund to the defendant of the sums paid as fine and costs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Nelson“hasty, ill considered, dark of night disposition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Nelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.