Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 CONNAPP 262 - State v. Flanagan

State v. Flanagan’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · State v. Golding · Beaufort Concrete Company v. Atlantic States Construction Company · United States ex rel. Maldonado v. Denno · Stuart v. Stuart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defendant's request for self-representation came at the close of the state's case, and after the testimony of thirty-seven ... witnesses, the introduction of ninety-two ... state exhibits, seventy-five ... defense exhibits, almost two weeks of evidence, and twenty-one ... days of jury selection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'Although the reason for the defendant's desire to represent himself, to call witnesses, may be legitimate on its face, that does not automatically lead to the conclusion that this factor weighs in favor of the defendant's interest in self-representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'Although there are basic rights that the attorney cannot waive without the fully informed and publically acknowledged consent of the client, the lawyer has-and must have-the full authority to manage the conduct of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.