In re McMahon’s Empirical Analysis
147 F. 684 · 1906
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 1937 · most notably Josiah Coder v. William Arts (1909), Rathman v. Booth (1910)
23 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mueller v. Nugent · Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Krippendorf v. Hyde · Market Company v. Hoffman · Bryan v. Louis Bernheimer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In respect to the judgment of the District Court overruling the objections made to the * * * jurisdiction, we have reached the conclusion that the action of that court was subject to review under the supervisory powers conferred upon this court by section 24b.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gibbons v. Goldsmith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.