In re Jacobs & Verstandig’s Empirical Analysis
147 F. 797 · 1906
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 1939
most recently cited
5 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Quackenbush · In re Bemis · In re Webb · In re O'Gara · In re Mendelsohn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Subdivision 1, § 14 [may be] read in connection with section 29b of the bankruptcy act. The word ‘concealed,’ read in this connection, is sufficiently elastic in its signification to comprise a continuous concealment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re James
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.