Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 F.2d 227 - Jackson County, S. D. v. Dufty

Jackson County, S. D. v. Dufty’s Empirical Analysis

147 F.2d 227 · 1945

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 1966
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1966

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

40194519501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reaney v. Union County · Barger v. Chelpon · Houska v. Hrabe · Joslin v. Linder · Chicago Great Western R. v. Mackie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The highway did not become defective in the described respects because it had 'become * * * destroyed or out of repair by reason' of any cause. These defects were inherent in the design or plan of the highway the county provided the public, and we con- elude that the present statute does not afford plaintiff a remedy for injuries proximately caused thereby.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person who shall sustain injury to person or property by reason of any violation of this section shall have a cause of action against the county, township, city, or town as the case may be for such damages as he may have sustained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the specific duty to guard and repair a damaged or destroyed highway.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.