Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 F.2d 629 - Davis v. Woolf

Davis v. Woolf’s Empirical Analysis

147 F.2d 629 · 1945

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2015

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

6019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 107 · 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Josiah Coder v. William Arts · Maynard v. Elliott · Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co. · Sweeny v. Sugar Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law by great weight of authority seems to be settled that when a corporation becomes insolvent, or in a failing condition, the officers and directors no longer represent the stockholders, but by fact of insolvency, become trustees for the creditors, and that they then cannot by transfer of its property or payment of cash, prefer themselves or other creditors....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““He [the trustee] would be authorized to proceed under § 70, sub. e, 11 U.S. C.A. § 110, sub. e, of the Bankruptcy Act which empowers the trustee to recover any property of the debtor affected by a transfer which under any federal or state law applicable thereto is fraudulent as against, or voidable for any other reason, by any creditor of the debtor having a provable claim against the bankrupt estate; and the case would turn, as the District Judge held, on the West Virginia law. See Commonwealth Trust Co. [of Pittsburgh] v. Reconstruction F. Co., 3 Cir. 120 F.2d 254 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.