Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 F.2d 658 - Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v. Walling

Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v. Walling’s Empirical Analysis

147 F.2d 658 · 1945

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2016

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

6019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 49 (§ 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 77V (§ 22 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 29 U.S.C. § 1 · 29 U.S.C. § 161 (§ 11 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 41 U.S.C. § 39 · 45 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Gouled v. United States · Wilson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is plain that appellant is not entitled to an adjudication of actual coverage as a prerequisite to the enforcement of the subpoena, rather the orderly and efficient enforcement of the [FLSA] within the framework of the constitutional rights of the parties involved, require only that the District Court have “the assurance that it is not giving judicial sanction and force to unwarranted and arbitrary action, but that reasonable grounds exist for making the investigation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.