Bowles v. Wingfield

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 6, 1945.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-02-06

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-02-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1982

3 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *683Fritz Krueger and Homer B. Parrent, both of Louisville, Ky., and David London and Fleming James, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Joe S. Garman, of Bowling Green, Ky., for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, ALLEN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This case was tried to the court without a jury. Neither the transcript of evidence nor the record contain any findings of fact specially made by the court, nor does it appear that any proposed findings or conclusions were requested by appellant. He made no motion for judgment and the record fails to disclose exceptions to the rulings of the court in the progress of the trial. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 46 and 52, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The appeal is dismissed because of failure to present a reviewable question for determination here.