Womack v. Runyon’s Empirical Analysis
147 F.3d 1298 · 1998
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Marsh v. Butler County (2001), 36 Cal. 4th 446 - Miller v. Department of Corrections (2005)
11 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Brame v. United States · Keenan v. Allan · Hennessy v. Penril Datacomm Networks, Inc. · DeCintio v. Westchester County Medical Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Title VII does not encompass a claim based on favoritism shown to a supervisor's paramour”); Taken v. Okla. Corp. Comm’n, 125 F.3d 1366, 1370 (10th Cir. 1997) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.