Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 147 F.3d 1334 - Construction Aggregates, Ltd. v. Forest Commodities Corp.

Construction Aggregates, Ltd. v. Forest Commodities Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

147 F.3d 1334 · 1998

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co. (1999), Schoenfeld v. Babbitt (1999)

15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

1401998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Jetco Electronic Industries, Inc. v. Gardiner · Ryan v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. · Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg) · Republic Health Corporation v. Lifemark Hospitals of Florida, Inc., Associated Medical Institutions, Inc., and Hialeah Hospitals, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “28 U.S.C. § 1291 . This section is the basis for the final judgment rule, which ordinarily requires that all claims and issues in a case be adjudicated before appeal. 22 The district court's partial summary judgment order, by itself, was not a”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e are not requiring the parties to continue litigation. All that [defendant] must do to appeal the partial summary judgment is have its remaining claims dismissed with prejudice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it makes no sense to require the parties to continue litigating a claim (that is, the second counterclaim) they say they were not required to bring in the first place.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.