Ellis v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
147 F.3d 139 · 1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc. · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Schweiker v. Hansen · Watson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Income” is defined “as anything that a recipient receives in cash or in-kind that can be used to meet the recipient’s needs for food, clothing and shelter. 20 C.F.R. § 416.1102 .” Ellis v. Apfel, 147 F.3d at 141 . . Navarro v. Sullivan, 751 F.Supp. 349 (E.D.N.Y.1990), upon which Hecht relies, is not to the contrary. At issue in Navarro was whether trust funds constituted a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.